Throughout this unit I have struggled with the concept of posting stuff on the internet. I am required to have a low internet presence for family reasons and so the concept of voluntarily posting things on the internet has been a challenging one. As a result of this, when setting up the blog I made it as hard to find as I could with my limited experiance, for example, it doesn’t show up in search engines. As such the connectivity I have with other blogs and an audience is currently limmited to whoever I give the URL to, which in this case has been the NMP mash-up, friends and family.
This hasn’t stoped me from looking at other blogs, but it has meant that I have been very reluctant to leave comments or record where I have been. I have also tried to write as little information about me in the various blog entries as possible with the exception of the brief posts in puppets. Although these posts tell people some of my interests, they don’t say much about anything else.

There is a growing role of social media within our society -just look at Twitter, Myspace and Facebook- but whether it is as wide spread as some claim… for me, the jury is still out.
In this article , the claim is made that “10% of Twitter users account for 90% of all tweets” as opposed to Facebook “where the top 10 per cent of users account for only 30 per cent of all content”. This would mean that most people join to see what the hype is about, try it for a month or so and then get bored. I guess if you compare the ability to continuously tweet, to the ability to keep a diary, (at least in my experiance) there are few people diciplined enough to keep it up for an extended period of time.
I think this is also reflected in blogs where there are sparodic entries every couple of months where it would appear people have gotten too busy to write one week and then one week becomes 2, 3, 4 etc… and the blog ends up becoming a series of sporadic posts. Although, if it is a series of really GOOD sporadic posts this doesn’t matter as much
This doesn’t mean that there aren’t some people who do have the dicipline to write regularly, but in many cases, it would appear that you can tell to some extent the reason someone joined the bloggosphere by the amount of activity on their site.
From what I have seen, people who create a blog with a specific purpose and direction, tend to have a greater presence in the bloggosphere then people who have created a blog for the sake of having a one, and fill it with random ranting. This summation doesn’t mean that there aren’t some random blogs that have generated a huge following, but in the majority of cases, this seems to be what happens.
Most successful blogs seem to build their followers by finding a specific niche to talk about, which people specifically search for and then join in on. The other less guarenteed way of creating an audiance is to let people stumble onto your site and create a feed-back loop where the more people look at it, the more popular it becomes to look at.
Therefore the ammount of connectivity a blog has within the blogoshpere depends on several factors:
- the aimand frequecy of the author
- the subject/s covered(if the subject/s they write on are popular, the chances of the blog also being popular is greater)
- who their friends are (if they have popular friends then people might check out the blogs these friends are following)
- chance (people randomly stumbling onto a blog they like)







